FOR MORE INFORMATION 314 210-1322
New York- On July 25th, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that products
resulting from Talens and CRISPR, which are new gene editing tools are, in fact,
genetically modified organisms (GMOs). This decision means that because these
organisms could not occur naturally, they will be kept under regulatory purview.
This landmark decision has important implications for biotechnology regulations
currently being revised by the US government.
"The decision by the ECJ which recognizes that new genetic technologies such as Talens
or CRISPR are still GMOs is groundbreaking," said Anne Petermann, Executive Director
of Global Justice Ecology Project and the Coordinator of the Campaign to STOP GE
Trees, some of whose members were involved in this important case. "It recognizes that
just because a technology makes genetic engineering easier or more accessible it does not
reduce the inherent risk of such endeavors.
"GJEP is encouraged by the ECJ's willingness to reign in corporations involved in
altering the genetic make up of the natural world.
"The United States must also recognize the vast potential for harm that is inherent in
genetically engineering our food and forests, whether transgenic or not. This is especially
urgent as researchers in the US consider plans to genetically engineer forest trees using
these new and unproven technologies."
The court's decision explicitly states, “In today’s judgment, the Court of Justice takes the
view, first of all, that organisms obtained by mutagenesis are GMOs within the meaning
of the GMO Directive, in so far as the techniques and methods of mutagenesis alter the
genetic material of an organism in a way that does not occur naturally. It follows
that those organisms come, in principle, within the scope of the GMO Directive and are
subject to the obligations laid down by that directive.”